Convicted priests simply moved on

adminonDecember 2, 2021January 5, 2022Leave a Comment

In Poland, 85 priests have already been convicted of sexual abuse in recent years. 24 bishops are now accused of protecting not the faithful but the convicted clergymen.

Victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests in Poland accuse 24 of the country's current and former bishops of covering up the crimes. In a 27-page report to Pope Francis published Thursday in Rome, the victims' association "Have No Fear" accused Warsaw Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz and Krakow Archbishop Marek Jedraszewski, among others, of protecting perpetrators of the crime.

The association had handed over the report to the Pope personally on Wednesday on the sidelines of the general audience.

Convicted priests moved on

Nycz, as bishop of Koslin-Kolberg (Koszalin-Kolobrzeg) in 2005, had transferred a parish priest sentenced to probation to continue working in another parish. As archbishop of Warsaw, he had helped the priest Piotr D. a new community, where he sexually abused two boys.

Jedraszewski was one of the "most ardent defenders" of former Poznan Archbishop Juliusz Paetz, the association said. Paetz is accused of sexual assaults on seminarians and priests; he denies it.

Also accused in the report are acting local bishops Slawoj Leszek Glodz (Gdansk), Jan Tyrawa (Bydgoszcz), Jozef Gorzynski (Warmia), Andrzej Dziuba (Lowicz), Jacek Jezierski (Elbing/Elblag), Jan Watroba (Rzeszow) and Andrzej Czaja (Opole).

85 priests have been convicted

Polish courts reportedly have sentenced 85 priests so far. On an online map, the association has registered 384 victims of abuse.

Francis had kissed the hand of the association's founder Marek Lisinski on Wednesday after speaking to him briefly. He had been abused by a priest for months when he was 13 years old.

Bishops' Conference: invitation to talk

Lisinski criticized in front of journalists that the president of the bishops' conference, Archbishop Stanislaw Gadecki, has not heard him so far. Bishops' Conference spokesman Pawel Rytel-Andrianik said in Warsaw that Gadecki's invitation to talk to the "Do not be afraid" foundation remains valid.

The bishops' conference had announced Wednesday an immediate response to the group's report once it was received and studied.

Film increased prere on Polish church

The Polish foundation "Do not be afraid," established in 2013, is named after Pope John Paul II's motto of the same name. named after his or her election in 1978.

In Poland in the fall of 2018, the feature film "Clergy" had increased prere on the Church. He denounced child sexual abuse by priests and its cover-up. More than five million viewers made it the most-watched movie in Poland since 2000.

How to deal with angry citizens, right-wing populists and their aggressive slogans against foreigners and "those up there"?? Cardinal Woelki calls for a mixture of humility and self-confidence, in other words: composure.

In his column for the news portal stern.Cardinal Woelki writes that the rampant right-wing populism needs and fuels "permanent agitation, doggedness in one's own narrow world view and selfishness of interest". True Christianity inspired by the Gospel, on the other hand, motivates the opposite, according to Woelki: "Serenity, humility and love.

The Cologne archbishop, who has repeatedly faced massive insults on social networks in the past, stresses that it is no coincidence "that Christian citizens voted significantly below average for the AfD in every election – including most recently in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania."

Resentment in the church, too

It is true that even among small groups in the church there is a "worrying susceptibility to ideological thinking, fanatical self-arance, resentment against everything foreign – ethnic, religious and sexual minorities – and aggressive slogans against a liberal-right policy of moderation and the center," Woelki said. But the vast majority do not follow these interceptions.

In his commentary, Woelki also admits shortcomings and sins in the church and calls for Christian humility instead ofKnow-it-all: "The number of Germans who think they can be 'chancellor' better than the current, experienced incumbent is as ridiculous as it is frighteningly large".

Constructive criticism necessary

The cardinal calls on users of social networks to refrain from "presumptuous disparagement of those who devote themselves to highly complex steering tasks in state and society". Constructive criticism, he said, is necessary in a system that is divided among powers, democratic and open to self-correction. The type of the "dogged rage citizen", on the other hand, must not be allowed to spread any further – otherwise there is a risk of losing the free, more people-friendly political system in Germany.

According to Woelki, citizens should oppose the attacks of angry citizens "with passion, a sense of responsibility and a sense of proportion – in other words, with a serenity in which humility and self-confidence are balanced."

Criticism of the CSU

Woelki had recently spoken out with a clear criticism of the CSU positions on refugee policy. He accused the party of contributing to polarization and doing the business of right-wing populists from the AfD with demands for upper limits for refugees or a preference for immigrants from the "Christian occidental cultural sphere".

At the same time, the archbishop called on the CSU to be faithful to the Constitution: "If the CSU takes the Basic Law seriously, it cannot demand an upper limit. The right of asylum does not allow that." Therefore, "the nonsensical discussion about upper limits must stop".

AfD as "laughing third"

Woelki also warned the party against the amption that it could benefit from a policy and rhetoric of inflammatory politics. "Whoever wants what the CSU propagates will end up voting for the AfD right away. She will be the laughing third."

The CSU executive committee had unanimously adopted its refugee paper on Saturday, but had previously changed the priority rule for immigrants from the "Christian occidental cultural circle". This, he said, should only apply to classic immigration, but not to asylum and refugee policy.

Pay please! 135 FLUGE BETWEEN TRIUMPH AND SUPPLY - THE SPACE SHUTTLE

The Space Shuttle, or Space Transportation System (STS) checked the manned space travel over three decades. From 1981 to 2011 it was the workhorse of NASA – with a variety of tasks. The spatial glider was a bond made of rocket and plane. And there were not the engineers or astronauts who bear responsibility for the two tragedies in 1986 and 2003 – it was impatient managers and a fatal feel of routine.

The idea of the Space Shuttle is a child of the 1960s. One was aware of a supply system for coarse tasks such as a space station, potential space power plants or even the assembly of a MARS spaceship. And through reusability, the planner wanted to save costs.

One of the concepts of two fully reusable systems. In addition to the Orbiter a carrier system, which returns to the earth after shipment of the shuttle to the earth. From costly, the concept was not pursued.

The idea of the Space Shuttle as the last child of the 60s

In 1969, NASA commissioned the US companies Lockheed, Grumman, McDonnell Douglas and North American Rockwell to develop a concept for a recyclable spacecraft. The domestic authority was able to rely on the projects X-15 and X-20.

During it the X-20 "Dyna-Soar" When a kind of one-man spatial glider did not manage from the concept stage, because in the early 1960s, resources were concentrated on the moon landing, the X-15 rocket aircraft of the US-Air Force came to 199 flights. The experiments delivered valuable data that was helpful for the Apollo program and the development of the Space Shuttle.

Further concepts that were discarded all in favor of the only partially recyclable space shuttle system.

In 1972 the development begins

Different concepts were examined. Some approaches that pursued a two-stage, completely recyclable system were discarded from weight and cost-based in favor of the space-shuttle concept: an orbiter with three main engines, which are fed through an external home tank and supported by two booster solids rackets. Although the representative hospital in 1972 approved the concept, but no longer at any price as in the moon landing. One demanded international partners and it should be borne by exposing commercial satellites.

John Young, astronautle legend and commander of the first Space Shuttle, learned about the moon of the authorization. On 21. April 1972 he was grade with astronaut Charles W. Duke landed on the earth’s trabor, which was pretended from the earth:

Houston: "Now the right moment for a good news seems to be. The Reprused Antenhaus has approved the space budget yesterday with 277 to 60 votes – so that the shuttle is secured!" Young and Duke: "Big! Outstanding! Big!" Duke: "Tony, I say it again, with a military grub: I’m proud to be American. I’ll tell you…" John Young: "The country urgently needs the shuttle; you will see!"

Since Young was directly involved in the planning of the shuttle, this was the same as a confirmation of a work order – on another sky corner.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply