Families – threatened with extinction?

adminonNovember 18, 2021January 5, 2022Leave a Comment

Patchwork families, single parents and same-sex relationships. Besides the classic family, many forms of life are possible. It is the task of politics to create framework conditions and not to prescribe certain ways of life. But the future of society nevertheless depends on children.

patchwork families, single parents and same-sex relationships. Beside the classical family many ways of life are possible. The task of politics is to create framework conditions, not to prescribe certain lifestyles. The future of society nevertheless depends on children. this site spoke with Armin Laschet, (CDU), North Rhine-Westphalia Minister for Generations, Family, Women and Integration about family in Germany. Laschet does not believe that people would decide to have more children because of parental allowance. In his eyes, it would have been more important to create childcare options. He also fears that parental allowance does not recognize family work on an equal footing with gainful employment. Experiences in Scandinavia showed that parental allowance could well give a boost to the birth rate. Young people still wanted to have their own family – but many did not realize their desire to have children. Germany, he said, must therefore address the question of why the birth rate in this country is one of the lowest.The program this site worldwide "Lebensform Familie – Zukunftsfrage fur Europa" (Family as a way of life – a question for the future of Europe) dealt with this topic in detail.

Was the gdr an unjust state?? East and west divided

Almost three quarters of Germans see the
GDR in retrospect as a Unrechtsstaat to. 73.9 percent fully or somewhat agreed with the statement. There is a clear difference in perception between East and West.

In the survey, 49.2 percent of Germans rated the East Germans the GDR as Unrechtsstaat, thus scarcely half. This compares with 80.9 percent of West Germans, who come to such an assessment.

The survey was conducted by the Opinion research institute Civey conducted on behalf of our editorial team.

GDR as a state of injustice? Prime ministers trigger debate

The debate about the historical classification of the German Democratic Republic was sparked by a statement by Thuringia's head of government, Bodo Ramelow (Die Linke), that the GDR was "clearly not a state under the rule of law" – although he avoided using the term "state under the rule of law" because, in his view, it was too directly linked to Nazi rule.

Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania's Minister President Manuela Schwesig (SPD) had also spoken out against the use of the term. CDU presidium member Mike Mohring then sharply criticized the East German minister presidents. Saxony's Minister President Michael Kretschmer stated clearly: "The GDR was a state of injustice."

Clear differences in assessment of the GDR depending on party affiliation

There are hardly any differences between the sexes in their perception of the GDR, but there are differences between the party affiliations. Among CDU/CSU members and supporters of the Greens and FDP, around 80 percent each agree with the classification as an unjust state.

They are followed by SPD and AfD supporters with 73 and 68 percent respectively. The Link, which is particularly strong in the East, is clearly lagging behind in terms of approval. Supporters of the Left Party share only 47.5 percent of the assessment that the GDR was an "unjust state".

Unemployed see GDR rather less as unjust state

While around three-quarters of employees, the self-employed, pensioners and students each share the assessment, only 56 percent of the unemployed/non-employed share it. There could be a connection with spatial differences – in many places, the unemployment rate is higher in the east than in the west.

Another conspicuous feature: the higher the level of education, the more likely it is that there is full or tendential agreement with the classification.

To the survey: In the survey conducted by Civey in the period from 7. October to 8. October online 8279 people participated. The sample size was 5016. The question was asked: "To what extent do you agree with the statement: "The GDR was an unjust state"??" (ses)

The Catholic Church was the first institution affected by the abuse scandal to decide on financial compensation for victims. According to the DBK, church institutions will pay victims of sexual assault up to 5.000 to victims of sexual assault if they can no longer assert their claims in court due to the statute of limitations. Here to the application form of the Catholic Church.

In addition, the church covers the cost of psychotherapy. In particularly serious cases, higher compensationmme can also be paid.

For preventive measures there will be a "prevention fund" geb
The concept adopted by the German bishops and religious superiors was presented at a meeting of the federal government's "Round Table," which is dealing with the processing of sexual abuse of minors. According to the German Bishops' Conference, it also wants 500.Provide € 000 for a "prevention fund" to finance projects for the prevention of new sexual assaults.

Current advance is not a rejection of a joint solution of the Round Table
It is not yet foreseeable when the "round table" will be able to agree on a common regulation for compensation, the German Bishops' Conference justified its move. The church, he says, has a duty to offer victims "help as quickly and unbureaucratically as possible even now". He went on to say, "Our present approach does not, however, imply a rejection of solutions that may yet be developed by the Round Table."

In a possible joint fund to pay for therapy costs, however, the Catholic Church does not want to participate. This is contradicted by the fact that religious orders and dioceses have been aming such costs "for quite some time" if they are not financed by the health insurance companies.

To receive compensationmme, those affected must submit a written application. Require a signed affidavit stating that as a minor or ward they were the victim of a sexual assault by church personnel. The applications will be reviewed by a commission and forwarded to the dioceses and religious orders concerned, which will ultimately decide on the amount of compensation. Legal recourse is excluded in this procedure, as it is a voluntary benefit of church institutions.

The money should not come from church tax funds
According to the Bishops' Conference, the money should not come from church tax funds. First, he said, attempts are being made to persuade the perpetrator to pay up. If this is not possible, the diocese or the order concerned will fall back on "other assets" to finance the compensation. How many cases of abuse there were nationwide in church institutions is as open as the question of how many victims will apply for compensation.

Starting from the Berlin Canisius College of the Jesuits, numerous cases of sexual abuse, often dating back decades, had become known in the past year, which had occurred at church as well as private and state institutions. Since many cases are time-barred under criminal and civil law, the federal ministries of justice, family and education have set up a "round table" with experts and representatives of affected organizations to find ways of coming to terms with them out of court and to identify strategies for preventing new cases from arising.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply